Low income housing program in East Mlk, Austin
The low income housing program below operate in East Mlk, Austin, ranked by a published rubric from recent Google reviews.
6 businesses, scored on rating, review volume, recency, sentiment and listing completeness. How we score › · View on map ›
At a glance
| # | Business | Score | Rating | From | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Huntington Meadows Apartments | 74 | 4.1 (127) | — | affordable apartments |
| 2 | Norman Commons Apartments | 67 | 4.8 (14) | — | affordable apartments |
| 3 | Reserve at Springdale Apartments | 59 | 3.4 (179) | — | senior low income housing |
| 4 | Nellie Apartments | 57 | 3.7 (34) | — | affordable apartments |
| 5 | Heritage Pointe | 55 | 3.4 (49) | — | affordable apartments |
| 6 | HousingWorks Austin | 26 | — | — | disability supportive housing |
Ranked picks

Huntington Meadows Apartments
score 74/100Residents consistently praise the office team, particularly Patricia and Ana, for quick responses and a welcoming atmosphere.

Norman Commons Apartments
score 67/100Most residents praise the calm, welcoming atmosphere and especially Ashley Moore and other staff for their hands-on help through the move-in process.

Reserve at Springdale Apartments
score 59/100Staff like Karen, Nancy, and Tisha earn repeated praise for patient, kind service during application and move-in.

Nellie Apartments
score 57/100Recent five-star reviews praise the new management team's responsiveness, full renovation, and included utilities, but older and recent one-star accounts describe persistent issues: staff refusing applications without explanation, centrally-controlled heating/cooling that residents cannot adjust, nonfunctional fire alarms, plumbing backups, and serious safety concerns including theft and violent crime.

Heritage Pointe
score 55/100Many residents praise the renovated apartments, new appliances, and friendly staff like Luis and Norma who respond quickly to requests.

HousingWorks Austin
score 26/100Review evidence for HousingWorks Austin is limited; no individual review text is available.